106 products across 9 categories, with 597 clear head-to-head comparisons.Browse all
Monitors comparison

BenQ PD3225U vs Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

Compare every shared field with exact values, visual meters and a clear winner for each measurable specification.

BenQ PD3225U

BenQ PD3225U leads the measurable fields

It wins 2 fields to 1, with 3 ties. This count covers listed numeric fields—not total product quality.

2BenQ winsTO1Dell wins3ties
VS
At a glance

Four differences most likely to change the choice.

Each card names the product with the measurable advantage and the size of the gap.

Larger workspace

BenQ PD3225U

BenQ PD3225U wins display by 17%.

More ports

BenQ PD3225U

BenQ PD3225U wins ports by 14%.

More USB-C charging power

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE wins usb-c power by 6%.

Field comparison

Read every measurable field as a meter.

Longer means stronger only for the stated direction. Exact values remain beside every bar.

Display size

A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.

Higher wins
BenQ PD3225U
31.5 in
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
27 in
Field winner Larger workspaceBenQ PD3225U

Maximum refresh rate

A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.

Higher wins
BenQ PD3225U
60 Hz
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
60 Hz
Field winner TieTie

Listed response time

Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.

Lower wins
BenQ PD3225U
5 ms
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
5 ms
Field winner TieTie

Peak listed brightness

Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.

Higher wins
BenQ PD3225U
400 nits
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
400 nits
Field winner TieTie

USB-C power delivery

Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.

Higher wins
BenQ PD3225U
85 W
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
90 W
Field winner More USB-C charging powerDell UltraSharp U2723QE

Listed connectivity ports

Port count is useful only when the included port types match your setup.

Higher wins
BenQ PD3225U
8
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
7
Field winner More portsBenQ PD3225U
Your Fit Meter

Make the decision personal.

Move the sliders to show how much each field matters to you. The result changes instantly and stays separate from the factual field winners.

BenQ PD3225U50/100
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE50/100
Adjust the sliders to calculate your fit.
Display6/10
A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.
Refresh rate6/10
A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.
Response time6/10
Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.
Brightness4/10
Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.
USB-C power4/10
Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.
Full field comparison

Every available field, value and winner.

8 of 8 fields have values for both products. Descriptive fields are shown without inventing a winner.

SpecificationBenQ PD3225UDell UltraSharp U2723QEField winner
Display
Display sizeA larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.
31.5 inWinner
27 in
Larger workspace

BenQ PD3225U has the higher listed value.

Peak listed brightnessHigher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.
400 nits
400 nits
Tie

Both products list the same value.

ResolutionResolution affects workspace and sharpness alongside screen size and scaling.
3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
Tie

Both products list the same value.

Panel technologyPanel labels do not capture every aspect of image quality.
IPS Black
IPS Black
Tie

Both products list the same value.

Motion
Maximum refresh rateA higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.
60 Hz
60 Hz
Tie

Both products list the same value.

Listed response timeResponse-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.
5 ms
5 ms
Tie

Both products list the same value.

Connectivity
USB-C power deliveryHigher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.
85 W
90 WWinner
More USB-C charging power

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE has the higher listed value.

Listed connectivity portsPort count is useful only when the included port types match your setup.
8Winner
7
More ports

BenQ PD3225U has the higher listed value.

Decision summary

Choose the strengths that fit your life.

Choose product A when…

BenQ PD3225U

Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:

  • Display: 31.5 in
  • Ports: 8
Choose product B when…

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:

  • USB-C power: 90 W
Field wins compare listed numbers only. They do not prove overall quality, durability, comfort, camera output or real-world performance. Product configurations and availability can vary; confirm the exact Amazon listing before purchase.
Keep exploring

Related monitors comparisons.

Browse category
Monitors Alienware AW3225QF leads 4-2
BenQ PD3225UVSAlienware AW3225QF

BenQ PD3225U wins usb-c power by 8500000000000%.

See the full comparison
Monitors Level at 3-3
BenQ PD3225UVSLG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B

BenQ PD3225U wins usb-c power by 8500000000000%.

See the full comparison
Monitors LG UltraGear 32GS95UE-B leads 3-2
BenQ PD3225UVSLG UltraGear 32GS95UE-B

BenQ PD3225U wins usb-c power by 8500000000000%.

See the full comparison
Monitors Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 G80SD leads 4-2
Dell UltraSharp U2723QEVSSamsung Odyssey OLED G8 G80SD

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE wins usb-c power by 9000000000000%.

See the full comparison
Monitors Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch leads 4-2
Dell UltraSharp U2723QEVSSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch

Dell UltraSharp U2723QE wins usb-c power by 9000000000000%.

See the full comparison
Monitors ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM leads 4-0
Dell UltraSharp U2723QEVSASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM wins refresh rate by 300%.

See the full comparison
BenQ at AmazonDell at Amazon