MonitorsProduct A
DellDell UltraSharp U2723QE
Sharper desk decisions
- Display: 27 in
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
- Response time: 5 ms
- Brightness: 400 nits
Monitors comparison
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE vs Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
Compare every shared field with exact values, visual meters and a clear winner for each measurable specification.
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch leads the measurable fields
It wins 4 fields to 2, with 0 ties. This count covers listed numeric fields—not total product quality.
2Dell winsTO4Samsung wins0ties
VS
MonitorsProduct B
SamsungSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
Sharper desk decisions
- Display: 57 in
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
- Response time: 1 ms
- Brightness: 1,000 nits
At a glance
Four differences most likely to change the choice.
Each card names the product with the measurable advantage and the size of the gap.
More USB-C charging power
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE wins usb-c power by 9000000000000%.
Higher refresh rate
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch wins refresh rate by 300%.
Higher peak brightness
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch wins brightness by 150%.
Larger workspace
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch wins display by 111%.
Field comparison
Read every measurable field as a meter.
Longer means stronger only for the stated direction. Exact values remain beside every bar.
Display size
A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
27 in
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
57 in
Field winner Larger workspaceSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
Maximum refresh rate
A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
60 Hz
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
240 Hz
Field winner Higher refresh rateSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
Listed response time
Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
5 ms
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
1 ms
Field winner Lower response timeSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
Peak listed brightness
Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
400 nits
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
1,000 nits
Field winner Higher peak brightnessSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
USB-C power delivery
Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
90 W
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
0 W
Field winner More USB-C charging powerDell UltraSharp U2723QE
Listed connectivity ports
Port count is useful only when the included port types match your setup.
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
7
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
6
Field winner More portsDell UltraSharp U2723QE
Your Fit Meter
Make the decision personal.
Move the sliders to show how much each field matters to you. The result changes instantly and stays separate from the factual field winners.
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE50/100
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch50/100
Adjust the sliders to calculate your fit.
Display6/10
A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.Refresh rate6/10
A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.Response time6/10
Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.Brightness4/10
Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.USB-C power4/10
Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.Full field comparison
Every available field, value and winner.
8 of 8 fields have values for both products. Descriptive fields are shown without inventing a winner.
| Specification | Dell UltraSharp U2723QE | Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch | Field winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display | |||
| Display sizeA larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it. | 27 in | 57 inWinner | Larger workspace Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch has the higher listed value. |
| Peak listed brightnessHigher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms. | 400 nits | 1,000 nitsWinner | Higher peak brightness Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch has the higher listed value. |
| ResolutionResolution affects workspace and sharpness alongside screen size and scaling. | 3840 x 2160 | 7680 x 2160 | No winner This field is descriptive, so no automatic winner is assigned. |
| Panel technologyPanel labels do not capture every aspect of image quality. | IPS Black | Mini LED VA | No winner This field is descriptive, so no automatic winner is assigned. |
| Motion | |||
| Maximum refresh rateA higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother. | 60 Hz | 240 HzWinner | Higher refresh rate Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch has the higher listed value. |
| Listed response timeResponse-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications. | 5 ms | 1 msWinner | Lower response time Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch has the lower listed value. |
| Connectivity | |||
| USB-C power deliveryHigher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops. | 90 WWinner | 0 W | More USB-C charging power Dell UltraSharp U2723QE has the higher listed value. |
| Listed connectivity portsPort count is useful only when the included port types match your setup. | 7Winner | 6 | More ports Dell UltraSharp U2723QE has the higher listed value. |
Decision summary
Choose the strengths that fit your life.
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:
- USB-C power: 90 W
- Ports: 7
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:
- Display: 57 in
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
- Response time: 1 ms
- Brightness: 1,000 nits
Field wins compare listed numbers only. They do not prove overall quality, durability, comfort, camera output or real-world performance. Product configurations and availability can vary; confirm the exact Amazon listing before purchase.
Keep exploring
Browse category Related monitors comparisons.
Monitors Alienware AW3225QF leads 4-2
Dell UltraSharp U2723QEVSAlienware AW3225QF
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE wins usb-c power by 9000000000000%.
See the full comparisonMonitors Level at 3-3
Dell UltraSharp U2723QEVSLG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE wins usb-c power by 9000000000000%.
See the full comparisonMonitors LG UltraGear 32GS95UE-B leads 4-2
Dell UltraSharp U2723QEVSLG UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE wins usb-c power by 9000000000000%.
See the full comparisonMonitors Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch leads 2-1
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inchVSSamsung Odyssey OLED G8 G80SD
Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 G80SD wins response time by 97%.
See the full comparisonMonitors ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM leads 3-1
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inchVSASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM wins usb-c power by 9000000000000%.
See the full comparisonMonitors Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch leads 4-2
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inchVSASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins usb-c power by 9600000000000%.
See the full comparison