106 products across 9 categories, with 597 clear head-to-head comparisons.Browse all
Monitors comparison

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV vs Gigabyte M32U

Compare every shared field with exact values, visual meters and a clear winner for each measurable specification.

A measured tie

The measurable fields finish level

Each product wins 3 fields, with 0 ties. Your priorities decide the better fit. This count covers listed numeric fields—not total product quality.

3ASUS winsTO3Gigabyte wins0ties
VS
At a glance

Four differences most likely to change the choice.

Each card names the product with the measurable advantage and the size of the gap.

More USB-C charging power

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins usb-c power by 540%.

Higher refresh rate

Gigabyte M32U

Gigabyte M32U wins refresh rate by 140%.

Lower response time

Gigabyte M32U

Gigabyte M32U wins response time by 80%.

Larger workspace

Gigabyte M32U

Gigabyte M32U wins display by 17%.

Field comparison

Read every measurable field as a meter.

Longer means stronger only for the stated direction. Exact values remain beside every bar.

Display size

A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.

Higher wins
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
27 in
Gigabyte M32U
31.5 in
Field winner Larger workspaceGigabyte M32U

Maximum refresh rate

A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.

Higher wins
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
60 Hz
Gigabyte M32U
144 Hz
Field winner Higher refresh rateGigabyte M32U

Listed response time

Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.

Lower wins
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
5 ms
Gigabyte M32U
1 ms
Field winner Lower response timeGigabyte M32U

Peak listed brightness

Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.

Higher wins
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
400 nits
Gigabyte M32U
350 nits
Field winner Higher peak brightnessASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

USB-C power delivery

Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.

Higher wins
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
96 W
Gigabyte M32U
15 W
Field winner More USB-C charging powerASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

Listed connectivity ports

Port count is useful only when the included port types match your setup.

Higher wins
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
8
Gigabyte M32U
7
Field winner More portsASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
Your Fit Meter

Make the decision personal.

Move the sliders to show how much each field matters to you. The result changes instantly and stays separate from the factual field winners.

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV50/100
Gigabyte M32U50/100
Adjust the sliders to calculate your fit.
Display6/10
A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.
Refresh rate6/10
A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.
Response time6/10
Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.
Brightness4/10
Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.
USB-C power4/10
Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.
Full field comparison

Every available field, value and winner.

8 of 8 fields have values for both products. Descriptive fields are shown without inventing a winner.

SpecificationASUS ProArt Display PA279CRVGigabyte M32UField winner
Display
Display sizeA larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.
27 in
31.5 inWinner
Larger workspace

Gigabyte M32U has the higher listed value.

Peak listed brightnessHigher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.
400 nitsWinner
350 nits
Higher peak brightness

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV has the higher listed value.

ResolutionResolution affects workspace and sharpness alongside screen size and scaling.
3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
Tie

Both products list the same value.

Panel technologyPanel labels do not capture every aspect of image quality.
IPS
IPS
Tie

Both products list the same value.

Motion
Maximum refresh rateA higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.
60 Hz
144 HzWinner
Higher refresh rate

Gigabyte M32U has the higher listed value.

Listed response timeResponse-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.
5 ms
1 msWinner
Lower response time

Gigabyte M32U has the lower listed value.

Connectivity
USB-C power deliveryHigher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.
96 WWinner
15 W
More USB-C charging power

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV has the higher listed value.

Listed connectivity portsPort count is useful only when the included port types match your setup.
8Winner
7
More ports

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV has the higher listed value.

Decision summary

Choose the strengths that fit your life.

Choose product A when…

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:

  • Brightness: 400 nits
  • USB-C power: 96 W
  • Ports: 8
Choose product B when…

Gigabyte M32U

Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:

  • Display: 31.5 in
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
  • Response time: 1 ms
Field wins compare listed numbers only. They do not prove overall quality, durability, comfort, camera output or real-world performance. Product configurations and availability can vary; confirm the exact Amazon listing before purchase.
Keep exploring

Related monitors comparisons.

Browse category
Monitors ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV leads 2-0
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRVVSDell UltraSharp U2723QE

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins ports by 14%.

See the full comparison
Monitors Alienware AW3225QF leads 4-2
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRVVSAlienware AW3225QF

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins usb-c power by 9600000000000%.

See the full comparison
Monitors Level at 3-3
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRVVSLG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins usb-c power by 9600000000000%.

See the full comparison
Monitors LG UltraGear 32GS95UE-B leads 3-2
Gigabyte M32UVSLG UltraGear 32GS95UE-B

Gigabyte M32U wins usb-c power by 1500000000000%.

See the full comparison
Monitors Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 G80SD leads 4-2
Gigabyte M32UVSSamsung Odyssey OLED G8 G80SD

Gigabyte M32U wins usb-c power by 1500000000000%.

See the full comparison
Monitors Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch leads 3-2
Gigabyte M32UVSSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch

Gigabyte M32U wins usb-c power by 1500000000000%.

See the full comparison
ASUS at AmazonGigabyte at Amazon