MonitorsProduct A
ASUSASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
Sharper desk decisions
- Display: 27 in
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
- Response time: 5 ms
- Brightness: 400 nits
Monitors comparison
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV vs LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
Compare every shared field with exact values, visual meters and a clear winner for each measurable specification.
A measured tie
The measurable fields finish level
Each product wins 3 fields, with 0 ties. Your priorities decide the better fit. This count covers listed numeric fields—not total product quality.
3ASUS winsTO3LG wins0ties
VS
MonitorsProduct B
LGLG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
Sharper desk decisions
- Display: 26.5 in
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
- Response time: 0.03 ms
- Brightness: 1,000 nits
At a glance
Four differences most likely to change the choice.
Each card names the product with the measurable advantage and the size of the gap.
More USB-C charging power
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins usb-c power by 9600000000000%.
Higher refresh rate
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B wins refresh rate by 300%.
Higher peak brightness
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B wins brightness by 150%.
Lower response time
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B wins response time by 99%.
Field comparison
Read every measurable field as a meter.
Longer means stronger only for the stated direction. Exact values remain beside every bar.
Display size
A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
27 in
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
26.5 in
Field winner Larger workspaceASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
Maximum refresh rate
A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
60 Hz
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
240 Hz
Field winner Higher refresh rateLG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
Listed response time
Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
5 ms
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
0.03 ms
Field winner Lower response timeLG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
Peak listed brightness
Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
400 nits
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
1,000 nits
Field winner Higher peak brightnessLG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
USB-C power delivery
Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
96 W
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
0 W
Field winner More USB-C charging powerASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
Listed connectivity ports
Port count is useful only when the included port types match your setup.
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
8
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
5
Field winner More portsASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
Your Fit Meter
Make the decision personal.
Move the sliders to show how much each field matters to you. The result changes instantly and stays separate from the factual field winners.
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV50/100
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B50/100
Adjust the sliders to calculate your fit.
Display6/10
A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.Refresh rate6/10
A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.Response time6/10
Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.Brightness4/10
Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.USB-C power4/10
Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.Full field comparison
Every available field, value and winner.
8 of 8 fields have values for both products. Descriptive fields are shown without inventing a winner.
| Specification | ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV | LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B | Field winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display | |||
| Display sizeA larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it. | 27 inWinner | 26.5 in | Larger workspace ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV has the higher listed value. |
| Peak listed brightnessHigher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms. | 400 nits | 1,000 nitsWinner | Higher peak brightness LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B has the higher listed value. |
| ResolutionResolution affects workspace and sharpness alongside screen size and scaling. | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 | No winner This field is descriptive, so no automatic winner is assigned. |
| Panel technologyPanel labels do not capture every aspect of image quality. | IPS | OLED | No winner This field is descriptive, so no automatic winner is assigned. |
| Motion | |||
| Maximum refresh rateA higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother. | 60 Hz | 240 HzWinner | Higher refresh rate LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B has the higher listed value. |
| Listed response timeResponse-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications. | 5 ms | 0.03 msWinner | Lower response time LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B has the lower listed value. |
| Connectivity | |||
| USB-C power deliveryHigher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops. | 96 WWinner | 0 W | More USB-C charging power ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV has the higher listed value. |
| Listed connectivity portsPort count is useful only when the included port types match your setup. | 8Winner | 5 | More ports ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV has the higher listed value. |
Decision summary
Choose the strengths that fit your life.
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV
Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:
- Display: 27 in
- USB-C power: 96 W
- Ports: 8
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-B
Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
- Response time: 0.03 ms
- Brightness: 1,000 nits
Field wins compare listed numbers only. They do not prove overall quality, durability, comfort, camera output or real-world performance. Product configurations and availability can vary; confirm the exact Amazon listing before purchase.
Keep exploring
Browse category Related monitors comparisons.
Monitors ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV leads 2-0
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRVVSDell UltraSharp U2723QE
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins ports by 14%.
See the full comparisonMonitors Alienware AW3225QF leads 4-2
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRVVSAlienware AW3225QF
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins usb-c power by 9600000000000%.
See the full comparisonMonitors LG UltraGear 32GS95UE-B leads 4-2
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRVVSLG UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins usb-c power by 9600000000000%.
See the full comparisonMonitors Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 G80SD leads 1-0
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-BVSSamsung Odyssey OLED G8 G80SD
Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 G80SD wins display by 21%.
See the full comparisonMonitors Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch leads 2-1
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-BVSSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57-inch wins display by 115%.
See the full comparisonMonitors ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM leads 3-0
LG UltraGear 27GR95QE-BVSASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM wins usb-c power by 9000000000000%.
See the full comparison