Monitors comparison

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV vs BenQ PD3225U

Compare every shared field with exact values, visual meters and a clear winner for each measurable specification.

A measured tie

The measurable fields finish level

Each product wins 1 fields, with 4 ties. Your priorities decide the better fit. This count covers listed numeric fields—not total product quality.

1ASUS winsTO1BenQ wins4ties

MonitorsProduct A

ASUS

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

Sharper desk decisions

Display: 27 in
Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Response time: 5 ms
Brightness: 400 nits

Buy now at Amazon

MonitorsProduct B

BenQ

BenQ PD3225U

Sharper desk decisions

Display: 31.5 in
Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Response time: 5 ms
Brightness: 400 nits

Buy now at Amazon

At a glance

Four differences most likely to change the choice.

Each card names the product with the measurable advantage and the size of the gap.

Larger workspace

BenQ PD3225U

BenQ PD3225U wins display by 17%.

More USB-C charging power

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV wins usb-c power by 13%.

Field comparison

Read every measurable field as a meter.

Longer means stronger only for the stated direction. Exact values remain beside every bar.

Display size

A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.

Higher wins

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

27 in

BenQ PD3225U

31.5 in

Field winner Larger workspaceBenQ PD3225U

Maximum refresh rate

A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.

Higher wins

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

60 Hz

BenQ PD3225U

60 Hz

Field winner TieTie

Listed response time

Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.

Lower wins

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

5 ms

BenQ PD3225U

5 ms

Field winner TieTie

Peak listed brightness

Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.

Higher wins

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

400 nits

BenQ PD3225U

400 nits

Field winner TieTie

USB-C power delivery

Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.

Higher wins

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

96 W

BenQ PD3225U

85 W

Field winner More USB-C charging powerASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

Listed connectivity ports

Port count is useful only when the included port types match your setup.

Higher wins

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

BenQ PD3225U

Field winner TieTie

Your Fit Meter

Make the decision personal.

Move the sliders to show how much each field matters to you. The result changes instantly and stays separate from the factual field winners.

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV50/100

BenQ PD3225U50/100

Adjust the sliders to calculate your fit.

Display6/10

A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.

Refresh rate6/10

A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.

Response time6/10

Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.

Brightness4/10

Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.

USB-C power4/10

Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.

Full field comparison

Every available field, value and winner.

8 of 8 fields have values for both products. Descriptive fields are shown without inventing a winner.

Specification	ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV	BenQ PD3225U	Field winner
Display
Display sizeA larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.	27 in	31.5 inWinner	Larger workspace BenQ PD3225U has the higher listed value.
Peak listed brightnessHigher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.	400 nits	400 nits	Tie Both products list the same value.
ResolutionResolution affects workspace and sharpness alongside screen size and scaling.	3840 x 2160	3840 x 2160	Tie Both products list the same value.
Panel technologyPanel labels do not capture every aspect of image quality.	IPS	IPS Black	No winner This field is descriptive, so no automatic winner is assigned.
Motion
Maximum refresh rateA higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.	60 Hz	60 Hz	Tie Both products list the same value.
Listed response timeResponse-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.	5 ms	5 ms	Tie Both products list the same value.
Connectivity
USB-C power deliveryHigher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.	96 WWinner	85 W	More USB-C charging power ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV has the higher listed value.
Listed connectivity portsPort count is useful only when the included port types match your setup.	8	8	Tie Both products list the same value.

Decision summary

Choose the strengths that fit your life.

Choose product A when…

ASUS ProArt Display PA279CRV

Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:

USB-C power: 96 W

Buy now at Amazon

Choose product B when…

BenQ PD3225U

Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:

Display: 31.5 in

Buy now at Amazon

Field wins compare listed numbers only. They do not prove overall quality, durability, comfort, camera output or real-world performance. Product configurations and availability can vary; confirm the exact Amazon listing before purchase.

Keep exploring