Monitors comparison

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM vs BenQ PD3225U

Compare every shared field with exact values, visual meters and a clear winner for each measurable specification.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM leads the measurable fields

It wins 4 fields to 1, with 1 tie. This count covers listed numeric fields—not total product quality.

4ASUS winsTO1BenQ wins1ties

MonitorsProduct A

ASUS

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

Sharper desk decisions

Display: 31.5 in
Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Response time: 0.03 ms
Brightness: 1,000 nits

Buy now at Amazon

MonitorsProduct B

BenQ

BenQ PD3225U

Sharper desk decisions

Display: 31.5 in
Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Response time: 5 ms
Brightness: 400 nits

Buy now at Amazon

At a glance

Four differences most likely to change the choice.

Each card names the product with the measurable advantage and the size of the gap.

Higher refresh rate

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM wins refresh rate by 300%.

Higher peak brightness

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM wins brightness by 150%.

Lower response time

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM wins response time by 99%.

More ports

BenQ PD3225U

BenQ PD3225U wins ports by 14%.

Field comparison

Read every measurable field as a meter.

Longer means stronger only for the stated direction. Exact values remain beside every bar.

Display size

A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.

Higher wins

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

31.5 in

BenQ PD3225U

31.5 in

Field winner TieTie

Maximum refresh rate

A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.

Higher wins

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

240 Hz

BenQ PD3225U

60 Hz

Field winner Higher refresh rateASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

Listed response time

Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.

Lower wins

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

0.03 ms

BenQ PD3225U

5 ms

Field winner Lower response timeASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

Peak listed brightness

Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.

Higher wins

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

1,000 nits

BenQ PD3225U

400 nits

Field winner Higher peak brightnessASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

USB-C power delivery

Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.

Higher wins

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

90 W

BenQ PD3225U

85 W

Field winner More USB-C charging powerASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

Listed connectivity ports

Port count is useful only when the included port types match your setup.

Higher wins

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

BenQ PD3225U

Field winner More portsBenQ PD3225U

Your Fit Meter

Make the decision personal.

Move the sliders to show how much each field matters to you. The result changes instantly and stays separate from the factual field winners.

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM50/100

BenQ PD3225U50/100

Adjust the sliders to calculate your fit.

Display6/10

A larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.

Refresh rate6/10

A higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.

Response time6/10

Response-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.

Brightness4/10

Higher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.

USB-C power4/10

Higher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.

Full field comparison

Every available field, value and winner.

8 of 8 fields have values for both products. Descriptive fields are shown without inventing a winner.

Specification	ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM	BenQ PD3225U	Field winner
Display
Display sizeA larger diagonal provides more physical workspace when resolution and desk depth suit it.	31.5 in	31.5 in	Tie Both products list the same value.
Peak listed brightnessHigher peak brightness can improve highlights and visibility in bright rooms.	1,000 nitsWinner	400 nits	Higher peak brightness ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM has the higher listed value.
ResolutionResolution affects workspace and sharpness alongside screen size and scaling.	3840 x 2160	3840 x 2160	Tie Both products list the same value.
Panel technologyPanel labels do not capture every aspect of image quality.	QD-OLED	IPS Black	No winner This field is descriptive, so no automatic winner is assigned.
Motion
Maximum refresh rateA higher refresh rate can make supported motion appear smoother.	240 HzWinner	60 Hz	Higher refresh rate ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM has the higher listed value.
Listed response timeResponse-time claims use different test methods and should be treated as listed specifications.	0.03 msWinner	5 ms	Lower response time ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM has the lower listed value.
Connectivity
USB-C power deliveryHigher power delivery can charge a wider range of compatible laptops.	90 WWinner	85 W	More USB-C charging power ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM has the higher listed value.
Listed connectivity portsPort count is useful only when the included port types match your setup.	7	8Winner	More ports BenQ PD3225U has the higher listed value.

Decision summary

Choose the strengths that fit your life.

Choose product A when…

ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM

Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:

Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Response time: 0.03 ms
Brightness: 1,000 nits
USB-C power: 90 W

Buy now at Amazon

Choose product B when…

BenQ PD3225U

Its strongest measurable advantages in this head-to-head are:

Ports: 8

Buy now at Amazon

Field wins compare listed numbers only. They do not prove overall quality, durability, comfort, camera output or real-world performance. Product configurations and availability can vary; confirm the exact Amazon listing before purchase.

Keep exploring